Saturday, January 30, 2010

Bamboccioni..They're not just in Italy

Working in international education in Rome allows me to have a critical distance for many things State-side. I work with and for college students. I love it- helping students make their study abroad dream become a reality nella Città Eterna. I enjoy being a part of the first semester of the rest of their lives: the amazing semester abroad that opens them up to a whole world of otherness, adventure and internationality.

However, it didn't really hit me until this year that they might be fleeing someone: their parents! I have to say that in all my 15 years of experience in international education, I have never felt such a protective parent alliance out there- yes, in the United States not Italy! We all know that the average Italian lives at home until way past their 30th birthday. Known as 'bamboccioni', these Italian youth are basically socially restricted: since they cannot find jobs, they remain at home with the p's until they can find a way to successfully contribute to society. They are protected and supported until the right moment comes along for them to fly the coop.

In the US, it is a totally different scenario- or at least it used to be. Nowadays, whether it is the crisis or whatever- there seems to be a trend in parenting where US 'bamboccioni' are becoming quite common. Not able to find jobs immediately after college due to the bleak state of the economy, many college grads have been forced to flock back home to mom and dad.
And these parents are quite protective of their fledglings being out there in the world alone- in Rome! Many of these helicopter parents are fending for their kids even if they are well beyond the age of 18! Don't get me wrong. I think it is great that these parents are involved in their son or daughter's life, but not to the point of filling out their application or sending emails on their behalf!! This subliminally strange need to live vicariously through their son or daughter is a bit unsettling. And, needless to say, impedes that individual to face life on her own.

Italian 'bamboccioni' are of course unique: high unemployment forces many of them into their state of eternal teenager. However, I do acknowledge that the US version is quite different and even more debilitating since it is pertpetuated by a parental need for control.

But does this control help or hinder? Familial support is necessary and I believe that is what compensates for the void in Italian public society. However, when does a parent let go?


Friday, January 8, 2010

Where are we safer?

In his superficial article, Prof. Dave Logan insists that there is something inherently wrong with the "culture" of US transportation security systems.
After having traveled to Chicago for Christmas, I can say that I have had my fair share of dealing with airport security on both sides of the Atlantic. Thanks to Mr. Exploding Underpants, I thought it would be like post-9/11 travel all over again at the international airports: suspicion, mistrust, racial profiling, and long, long, long lines at security scanners.

But this time, I guess we were lucky. Upon arriving at O'Hare Int. Airport, the longest line we faced was at the check-in counter (we flew Alitalia) and not at the security scanner. Once we did finally check-in, we waited about 20-25 minutes to then be diverted to the "Business/First Class" line (I had no idea this existed). My husband and I were thrilled, looking at ourselves like 'are we in the right line'. Then when trying to be super-cooperative, we felt a little abrasiveness by the people who were conducting the security check- one was obviously tired and quickly frisked me letting me go even though I beeped. Her colleague was staring vacantly into space not addressing my need for more plastic trays to put all our carry on stuff in. And the guy from Homeland Security who checked our passports and boarding passes took his sweet time but seemed so tired and had such a blank, glassy stare he made me wonder if he actually was all that coherent. These security workers must not only be overworked due to cutbacks but must also be a little upset that they have to work twice as hard now that the security level was raised to orange.

According to Logan, I guess these people have a "my life stinks" attitude or 'culture' as he would call it. They "plod along doing the minimum not to get fired." But whose responsibility is it anyway? Well Obama, the righteous guy that he is, has stepped up and taken all of the blame- even though it is not completely his responsibility. I do think that Logan is right up to a certain point. But I do not think simple generalizations about organizational failure help solve the problem. I think Obama's plan to fix the intelligence system is a step in the right direction because it is grounded in communication with other governments and using more human resources. More importantly, we need to examine not only our 'culture' on how things get done but more specifically we must change our attitude or disposition in how we perform our social duties and approach public arenas of interaction- from airports to the workplace.

It's all in the attitude. But is that something that can be detected with a heat-sensitive body scanner?